AN ANALYSIS OF CLASSROOM INTERACTION IN ENGLISH TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESS AT EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP IT ANNIDA LUBUKLINGGAU
Abstract
This research aimed to find and descrybe the classroom interaction in the English teaching and learning process of the Eighth class at SMP IT Annida Lubuklinggau. This research designed in a descriptive qualitative research with a naturalistic approach. The Subject of this research at SMP IT Lubuklinggau in collecting the data were observations through online systems and in-depth interviews. The result were (1) interaction in the pre-teaching which was further divided into four, namely greeting, asking students’ condition, checking students’ attendance, and telling the materials that would be learnt by the students in the meeting; (2) interaction in whilst-teaching which was further divided into three, namely motivating students to learn, rewarding the students, and helping the students learn the material; and (3) interaction in post-teaching. The interaction between the teacher and a student was divided into three (1) interaction in pre-teaching; (2) interaction in whilst- teaching which was further divided into two, namely discussing the material activity, and evaluating management activity which were divided into three, namely interaction in evaluating based on random technique, interaction based on students’ active, and interaction in evaluating based on students’ attention; and (3) interaction in post-teaching. Interaction between student and student was focused on (1) interaction in pre-teaching; (2) interaction in whilst-teaching divided into two namely, discussing the material activity, and practicing English activity; and (3) interaction in post-teaching. Interaction between the student and the material was focused on (1) interaction in pre-teaching; (2) interaction in whilst-teaching; and interaction in post-teaching.
References
Astuti, M. M. (2013). An analysis of Classroom Interactional in the English Teaching and Learning Process of the Bilingual Class in the First Grade of SMPN 1 Prambanan. An Analysis of Classroom Interactional in the English Teaching and Learning Process of the Bilingual Class in the First Grade of SMPN 1 Prambanan, 2(4).
Azizah, U. N. (2009). Review of Related Literature. Definition of Interaction, 2, 3500.
Brown. (2001). Theoretical Review and Conceptual Framwork. 8–37.
C.Richards, J., & S.Rodgers, T. (2007). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews, 21(1), 20–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/014836
Chaudron. (1998). Interaction_in_the_speaking_classroom e (p. 7).
Crystal, D. (2016). English as a Global Language. In The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language (second). Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-32505-1
Hanum, N. S. (1392). The Importance of Classroom Interactional in the Teaching of Reading in Junior Hihg School. The Importance of Classroom Interactional in the Teaching of Reading in Junior Hihg School, 23, 1–9.
Hastuti, W. (2014). Using Games to Improve Classroom Interaction in the English Teaching Learning Process at Grade IV of SDN Puren in the Academic year of 2013/2014. 175.
Hoerun Nisa, S. (2014). Classroom Interaction Analysis in Indonesian Efl Speaking Class. English Review: Journal of English Education, 2(2), 1–9.
Kaufmann, B. Y. K. (2005). Background of Translation. March, 25–27.
Khaliyah, K. S., & Rachman, D. (2019). Impact of teacher ’ s interaction pattern for seventh grade student. 2(157), 104–110.
Mallipa, I., & Murianty, R. (2019). English Teachers’ Decision in Utilizing Textbook in Their Classroom. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 2(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v2i2.588
Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects. UTC Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 85654(85654), 1. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/85654/1/MPRA_paper_85654.pdf
Murtiningrum, S. (2009). Classroom interaction in English Learning. Master Thesis, Sanata Dharma University,Yogyakarta.
Nisa, S. H. (2012). Classroom Interaction Analysis in the EFL Speaking Class. Classroom Interaction Analysis in the Efl Speaking Class, 66(2010041206), 37–39.
Nugraheni, I. (2010). Speech Functions in English Teaching in a Vocational High School.
Nunan. (2002). Literature Review and Conceptual Framework. 57, 7–27.
Oktaviani, E. B. (2019). AN ANALYSIS OF VERBAL CLASSROOM INTERACTION AND ITS CHARACTERISTICS : FLANDERS ’ INTERACTION FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND ARTS.
Rabiah, S. (2012). Language as a Tool for Communication and Cultural Reality Discloser. Presented in 1st International Conference on Media, Communication and Culture, 1–18. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1690-0025.
Retnaningtyas, R. (2011). The Classroom Management of English Teaching-Learning Process in a Big Class.
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1996). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. In System (second, Vol. 24, Issue 1). 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251x(96)84114-5
Sari, F. M. (2015). An Analysis of Classroom Interaction in the English Teaching Process. 7–30.
Siegel, A., & Seedhouse, P. (2019). Conversation Analysis and Classroom Interaction. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0198.pub2
Supriyanti, N. (1994). English to the Indonesia Elementary Schools. 146–152.
Widyatama, I. Z. S. (n.d.). A Tool to Improve Classroom Interactional. 465–470.
Yulfi. (2017). An Analysis of Deixis and Speech Act Used in English Teaching and Learning Process. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 1(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v1i1.34
