TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION BY USING PROBING-PROMPTING LEARNING STRATEGY TO THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMPN 7 PALEMBANG

  • Sherly Marliasari Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang
  • Tika Okta
Keywords: Teaching, reading comprehension, probing-prompting strategy

Abstract

The objective of the study was to find out whether or not it is effective to teach reading comprehension by using probing-prompting learning strategy. The researcher used pre experimental method. The population of the study was the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 7 Palembang was 337 students. The researcher took the sample 36 students by using the convenience sample. Analyzing the data was collected through a written test and calculated by SPSS 16. Based on the data analysis, the result of pretest indicated that the highest score was 70 and the lowest score was 50. In the result of t-test, it was founded that t-obtained was 9.574, so it was higher than the critical value of t-table was 1.690 with (df-1) n=35 at the level of significance 0.05 for one-tailed test. It means that the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted.

Author Biography

Tika Okta

Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang

References

Arikunto, S (2006). Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Asdi Mahasatya.

Bima, B & Kurniawati, C. Bahasa Inggris untuk SMP/MTs. Klaten: Intan Pariwara.

Brown, H.D. (2000). Principle of Language Learning and Teaching, (4th ed). San Fransisco: Longman.

----------------(2004). Language Assesment Principle: Principles and Classroom Practice. NY: Longman.

----------------(2007). Principle of Language Learning and Teaching. United States: Pearson Education.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language (2nd ed). NY: Cambridge University Press.

Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., Hyun, H.H (2012). How To Design and Evaluate Research and education (8th ed). NY: Connect Learn Succeed.

Grabe, W, & Stoller, F.L. (2002). Teaching and Researching Reading (2nd ed). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Hibbard, K.M., & Wagner, E. A. (2013). Assessing and teaching reading comprehension and writing (4thed.). New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis group.
Huda, M. (2014). Model-Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar. http://www.englishindo.com/2012/07/descriptve-text.html.




Klinger, J.K (2007). Teaching Reading Comprehension to he Students with Learning Difficulties. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.

Marczyk, G., DeMatteo, D., &Frestinger, D. (2005).Essential of research design and methodology. America: John Wiley & sons, inc.
Pang, E.S. Muaka, A. Bembardt, E.B., & Kamil, M.L. (2003). Teaching Reading. Chicago: University of Illimois.

Rosnawati, H. (2008). Penggunaan Teknik Probing Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Mate-matika Siswa SMP. Retrieved by 30 Juli 2017 from https://ayuface.wordpress.com/2010/12/25/pembelajaran-probing-prompting/.

Royanti. (2007). The Use of English Comics to Improve Student’s Ability.
Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis: Semarang State University.

Seyler, Also. (2004). The Reading Context. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: toward an R & D Program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Syahri, I. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Palembang: Roemah Sufie.

Wilhelm, Jeff. (2012). Undestanding Reading Comprehension. Retrieved by 7 May 2017 from
http://www.scholatic.com/teachers/article/undestanding-reading-comprehension.
Published
2018-07-22