Kajian Retorika Struktur Argumen Karya Tulis Ilmiah Siswa Hasil Ekstrakurikuler Karya Ilmiah Remaja SMA
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe the structure of the background arguments for the scientific papers contained in the introduction of KIR extracurricular scientific papers for high school students. The research method uses a qualitative descriptive method. The data collection technique uses documentation techniques that are sourced from extracurricular scientific papers by high school adolescents. Data analysis techniques with the steps of coding, classification, and interpretation. Validity test with member check and discourse expert test. The results showed that the argument structure of students' scientific papers extracurricular activities of high school adolescents was patterned: 1) claim, justifications, and conclusions; 2) claim, justifications, conclusions, and sub-conclusions; 3) claim, sub-claim, justifications, and conclusions; 4) claim, justifications, sub-justifications and conclusions; 5) claim and justification. The structure of the argument in scientific writing is good, although some are incomplete, especially the conclusion that has not been presented. The results of this study are expected to be followed up, especially for the extracurricular trainer of high school adolescent scientific papers to provide understanding to students in writing argument paragraphs using a complete variation of argument patterns, namely claim, justifications, and conclusions.
References
Atmaja, H. (2016). Analisis Struktur Retorika Bagian Hasil dan Pembahasan Artikel Jurnal Bidang Berbahasa Indonesia Bidang Ilmu Sastra pada Jurnal “BISA” FKIP Universitas Bengkulu. Diksa : Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(2), 150–156. doi:10.33369/diksa.v2i2.3412
Fitri, A. (2002). “Retorika dalam Penulisan Surat Pribadi Tahun 2001”. Tesis. Bengkulu: FKIP Universitas Bengkulu.
Jauhari, H. (2018). Terampil Mengarang dari Persiapan Hingga Presentasi dari Opini Hingga Sastra. Bandung: Nuansa Cendikia.
Keraf, G. (2010). Argumentasi dan Narasi Lanjutan. Jakarta: Gramedia Utama.
Krippendorff. (1993). Analisis Isi Pengantar Teori dan Metodologi. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada.
Noermanzah, Emzir, & Lustyantie, N. (2018). President Joko Widodo’s Rhetorical Technique of Arguing in the Presidential Speeches of the Reform Era. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(5), 119. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.5p.117
Noermanzah, N., Emzir, E., & Lustyantie, N. (2017). Variety of Rhetorics in Political Speech President of the Republic of Indonesia Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and Joko Widodo in Educational Field. Humanus, 16(2), 221. doi:10.24036/humanus.v16i2.8103
Noermanzah, Wahyuni, S., Astuti, T., Wardhana, D. E. C., & Syafryadin. (2020). The Rhetorical Structure of the Lubuklinggau Mayor's Speech in Building Community Trust. Retrieved from osf.io/j8p9t. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT), 19(2).
Safnil. (2010). Pengantar Analisis Retorika Teks. Bengkulu: FKIP UNIB Press.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sulistyarini, D. & Zainal, A. G. (2020). Buku Ajar Retorika. Serang Banten: CV. AA Rizki.
Suparno. (2017). Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Susetyo. (2010). Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. Bengkulu: FKIP UNIB.
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses Of Argumen. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Trianto, A. (2000). “Retorika Humor Mahasiswa Tahun 2000 (Laporan Penelitian)”. Bengkulu: FKIP Universitas Bengkulu.
Trianto, A. (2009). Kajian Retorika Tulisan Kolom. Jakarta: Kolita Internasional.
Yati, D. (2018). “Pola dan Kadar Ketajaman Argumen Bagian Hasil Penelitian dan Pembahasan pada Artikel Mahasiswa Program Magister (S2) Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia FKIP Universitas Bengkulu Tahun Ajar 2016/2017”. Tesis. Bengkulu: FKIP Universitas Bengkulu.