Residency, Identity, and Language Attitude in Food-Talk

A Study Among Urban and Suburban Community in Lubuklinggau

  • Sastika Seli STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau
Keywords: Language attitude, Identity, Residency, Food-talk, Sociolinguistics

Abstract

The research aims at describing the influence of residency between urban and suburban language speakers in showing language attitude when talking about food. The data were collected through participant observation as well as recording technique, noting technique and ethnographic interview. The findings show the identity of urban and suburb language speakers in talking about food including 1) urban identity description of health dealing with diet and disease, 2) suburban identity description of the concept of villagers who love traditional food, and 3) suburban identity description of traditional food ritual. Language attitude in food-talk between urban and suburban language speakers including 1) attitude indicated by the use of pronoun we; 2) the descipription of special food vocabularies refer tofood process and menus; and 3) attitude indicated in lexical borrowing. The distinc attitude and identity between urban and suburban language speakers are determined by the description of special food vocabularies related to process, material and menus. Suburban people are proud of explaining their food ritual in gathering food ingredient and processing it using their mother tongue. In urban society, speakers tend to talk about food dealing with modern life style, such as health.

 

References

Alamsyah, Y. (2009). Antisipasi krisis global: Bisnis fast food á la Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.
Arifin, H. (2017). Language Attitude and Word Formation of Food Menu Names in The Food Court of Parahyangan Apartment ( Doctoral dissertation, State Islamic University of Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung, Indonesia) Retrieved from http//:digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/56
Ayeomoni, M. O. (2011). Language, food and culture: Implications for language development and expansion in Nigeria. International Journal of Education Research and Technology, 2(2), 50-55.
Ayu, W. (2016). Bedanya cita rasa kuliner jawa dan sumatera. Retrieved from http//bello.id/2016/03/23/bedanya-cita-rasa-kuliner-jawa-dan-sumatera/
Chaer, A., & Agustina, L. (2014). Sosiolinguistik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Clifford, E. (2017). What is suburban area?. Retrieved from https://classroom.synonym.com/what-is-a-suburban-area-12078981.html
Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd. ed) Unites State of America: Sage Publications, Inc.
Djajasudarma, F. (2010).Metode linguistik:Ancangan metode penelitian dan kajian. Bandung: Reflika Aditama.
Farooq, U. (2012). Characteristics of rural and urban community. Retrieved from http://www.studylecturenotes.com/social-sciences/sociology/360-characteristics-of-rural-and-urban-community
Holmes, J. & Meyerhoff, M. (2003). The handbook of language and gender. Maiden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Islam, G. (2014). Social Identity Theory. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 1781-1783
Lee, R. (2006). Globalization, language, and culture. New York: An imprint of Infobase Publishing.
Ma, G. (2015). Food, eating behavior, and culture in Chinese society. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 2, 195-199.
Mahsun. (2012). Metode penelitian bahasa: Tahap strategi, metode, dan tekniknya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Milroy, L., & Gordon, M. (2003). Sociolinguistics: Method and interpretation. Melbourne: Blackwell Publishing.
Muñoz-Basols, J., Ardjan, P.,& David, M. (2013) Phonological humor as perception and representation of foreignness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Szatrowski, P. E. (2014). Language and food: verbal and non-verbal experience. Philladelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
Published
2018-12-06