Kemampuan Mahasiswa Menganalisis Tes (Soal) Bahasa Indonesia Sesuai Aspek Ranah Kognitif Model Anderson dan Krathwohl
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe the ability to analyze the Indonesian language test (question) made by Indonesian language teachers according to the cognitive domain of the Anderson and Krathwohl model online for students of the Indonesian Language Education S-1 Program FKIP Bengkulu University, regarding the construction of (a) the characteristics of the cognitive domain according to the verb operational, (b) interesting and contextual-based question stimulus, and (c) Indonesian language question construction applying KKO. This study uses a descriptive method and a simple quantitative approach as well as through an online learning system. Data collection uses documentation and test techniques. The research instrument was in the form of document recording guidelines (tests) to analyze all teacher-made Indonesian questions to obtain a description of the quality of each question. The research data is in the form of 40 documents resulting from descriptions of Indonesian language questions (essays and multiple choice) which cover six cognitive aspects. The main data analysis technique uses the average formula and qualitative conclusion analysis through the description of the construction of Indonesian language questions. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the ability of students to analyze teacher-made Indonesian tests (questions) in online lesson plans based on the cognitive domain of the Anderson and Krathwohl model online for undergraduate students of Indonesian Language Education FKIP Bengkulu University was categorized as good with an average score of 89.25 (at score range 73-96). These results are corroborated by the average score of the six cognitive aspects of 7.44 in the good category (in the score range 7-8). Students have been able to analyze the use of operational verbs in the six cognitive aspects in the construction of essay and multiplechoice Indonesian test kits (questions). A description of the use of operational verbs in Indonesian language questions explicitly or implicitly, such as the use of the word explaining in the aspect of knowing (C1), the word mentioning the characteristics in the aspect of understanding (C2), the word determining in the aspect of applying (3), the word finding meaning in the aspect of analyzing (C4), the word concludes the content of the text on the evaluating aspect (c5), and the word develops or writes a short story on the creative aspect (C6).
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2017). Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen Revisi Taksonomi Pendidikan Bloom. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Brookhart, S.M. (1990). The art and Science of Classroom Assessment: The missing part of pedagogy. Washington DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education and Office of Educational Research an Improvement.
Daryanto, H. (2005). Media Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Dewi, W. A. F. (2020). “Dampak Covid-19 Terhadap Implementasi Pembelajaran Daring di Sekolah Dasar.” Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 55-61, https://edukatif.org/index.php/edukatif/article/view/89
Djiwandono, M. S. (1996). Tes Bahasa dalam Pengajaran. Bandung: Penerbit ITB.
Giyanto, S. S. (2018). Modul Penyusunan Soal Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas.
Gronlund, N. E. (1990). Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching. New York: Mcmillan Publishing Company.
Hanna, H. (2014). Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Mau Dibawa Ke Mana?. BAHTERA : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 13(1), 50 - 71. https://doi.org/10.21009/BAHTERA.131.6
Irawati, H., Saifuddin, M. F., & Ma’rifah, D. R. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes dan Non Tes dalam Rangka Menyiapkan Penilaian Autentik pada Kurikulum 2013 di SMP/MTs Muhammadiyah se-Kabupaten Bantul. Jurnal Pemberdayaan: Publikasi Hasil Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(2), 503. doi:10.12928/jp.v1i2.362
Moleong, L. J. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyasa, E. (2014). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nugroho, S. (2013). HOTS Higher Order Thingking Skills). Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.
Nurgiyantoro, B. (2005). Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012: Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2018). PISA 2015: PISA Result in Focus. Paris: PISA-OECD Publishing.
Puspendik. (2015). Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Laporan Hasil Ujian Nasional Grafik Penguasaan Materi Ujian Nasional. Pusat Penelitian Pendidikan (Puspendik): Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Setiawati, W., dkk. (2018). Buku Penilaian Berorientasi Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS): Program Peningkatan Kompetensi Pembelajaran Berbasis Zonasi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan, Kemdikbud.
Sofyan, T.F A. (2006). Evaluasi Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: UIN Press.
Widana, I. W. (2017). Modul Penyusunan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS). Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan SMA, Dirjen Dikdasmen Kemdikbud.
Indonesia Language Education Program Room, STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau, Mayor Toha Street, Lubuklinggau City, South Sumatera, Indonesia, zip code: 31628, Telepon: (0733) 451432 Ext. 811, Email: silamparibisa@stkippgri-lubuklinggau.ac.id, Website: 
