TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH SUMMARIZING TRAINING CAMP TECHNIQUE TO THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 5 LUBUKLINGGAU IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2015/2016

  • Episiasi E. STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau
  • Alen Syahputra STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau
Keywords: Teaching, Reading Comprehension, Summarizing Training CampTechnique

Abstract

The problem of the study was “Is it significant ly effect ive after the application of Summarizing Training Camp Technique on teaching reading comprehension to the tenth grade students of SMA Negeri 5 Lubuklinggau in the academic year of 2015/2016?”. The objective of this study was to find out whether or not there is significantly effective on reading comprehension after the application of Summarizing Training Camp Technique to the tenth grade students at SMA Negeri 5 Lubuklinggau. In this study, the writer proposed two hypotheses. They were null hypothesis (Ho) and alternative hypothesis (Ha). The method applied was pre-experimental with one group pre-test posttest design. The population of this study was all of the tenth grade students of SMA Negeri 5 Lubuklinggau which consisted of 245 students. The sample was taken through convenience random sampling which consisted of 40 students. The data were collected by means of test consisting 25 items of multiple choices. The data obtained were analyzed through three techniques: 1) Individual Score, 2) Conversion of Individual Score Based on Minimum Mastery Criteria, and 3) Matched t-test. The results of this study shows that  the students’ mean  score in the pre-test was 66.9 and those in the  post-test was 76. The result of matched t test was 6.89, which was higher than t-table value (1.684) of 39 with 95% significant level for one tailed-test. Therefore, the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. It means that it was significantly effective to use Summarizing Training Camp Technique in teaching reading comprehension to the tenth grade students of SMA Negeri 5 Lubuklinggau in the academic year of 2015/2016.

References

Addison, J. 1996. Definition of Reading. http://www.siu.edu/~arc/chapter3.Html14k. Accessed On March 7, 2011.
Afriani, R. 2010. Teaching Reading Comprehension using Individualized Reading to the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Negeri 1 Indralaya. Palembang: University of PGRI Palembang.
Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bieger, G.R. and Gail, J.G. 1996. Educational Research. New York: Delmar
Brown. 2007. Principle of Language Learning and Teaching. San Fransisco: pretince. Hall, Inc.
Everatt, J. 1999. Reading and Dyslexia. London: Routledge.
Fraenkel, J.R. and Norman E.W. 1990. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: M Graw-Hill, Inc.
Gebhard, J.G. 2000. Teaching English as a Foreign or Second Language. New York: The University of Michigan Press.
Grellet, F. 1983. Developing Reading Skill. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Hatch, E. and Hosein, F. 1982. Research Design and Statistics. Los Angeles: Newburry House Publisher.
Heaton, J.B. 1989. Writing English Language Test. New York: Longman Group.
Hengle, H. 2001. Teaching English as a School Foreign Language. New York: Hengle and Heinle
Jeff, Z. 2004. Building Reading Comprehension Habits in Grades 6-12: Toolkit of Classroom Activities. International Reading Association, Inc.
Jihad, A. and Haris, A. 2008. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo
Langan, J. 2010. Ten Steps to Advancing College Reading Skills. New Jersey. Towsend Press.
Moon, 2000. Teaching concepts and vocabulary: Principles and strategies. [Online] http://coe.sdsu.edu/people/jmora/ConceptsTch.html. (19 Jan 2013).
Moore. 2005. Effective Instructional Strategies from Theory to Practice. California: Sage Publication Inc.
Parera. 1993. Definition of Narrative Text. New York: Delmar.
Paul, D. 2003. Teaching English to Children in Asia. HongKong: Person Education Asia Limited
Philip. K. 1996. Teaching English. Accessed from www.Teachingenglish.pdf retrieved on January, 21th, 2013.
Richards, J.C. 1985. Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Hong Kong: Longman Group (FE) Ltd.
Saleh, Y. 1997. Methodologyo of Tefl in the Indonesian Context Book 1. Palembang: Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Sriwijaya University.
Snow, C. 2002. Reading for Understanding. Pittsburgh: RAND.
Sudrajat. and Subana, 2001. Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Ilmiah. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Sugiyono. 2001. Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Ilmiah. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Sudarwati. and Grace, 2007. Generic Structure of Narrative Text. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sundari. 2010. Teaching Reading Comprehension Through REDW (Read, Examine, Decide,Write) Strategy with Theme “The Nature” to the Eighth Grade Students At SMP Negeri 20 Palembang. Palembang: University of PGRI Palembang.
Tarigan, H.G. 2008. Membaca sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa.Bandung: Angkasa.
Valenzuela. 2002. Definition of Communication. [online] avaible in http://cmnctn.org.ak/communicatio n 09. Retervied on november 09th 2011.
Vaughn, S. and T. Linan. 2004. Research Based Method of Reading Instruction. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wardiman, A. and J.B. Masduki. 2008. English in Focus. Malang: Temprima Media Grafika.
Published
2015-12-31