KEMAMPUAN MEMAHAMI PUISI PADA SISWA KELAS XI SMA ALIKHLAS LUBUKLINGGAU MELALUI INTEGRASI STRATEGI 2 EKSPOSITORIK DAN STRATEGI HEURISTIK

  • Nur Nisai Muslihah STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau
Keywords: Folktale, Comprehension, Expository, Heuristic, Strategy

Abstract

The problem in the development of teaching and learning innovation in the classroom is Is it effective to use integrated expository and heuristic strategy in increasing the eleventh grade students fokltale comprehension at SMA Al Ikhlas Lubuklinggau. This teaching and learning innovation development was to find out to what extent the integrated expository and heuristic strategy increased the eleventh grade students folktale comprehension at SMA Al Ikhlas Lubuklinggau. The development of this teaching and learning inovation was carried out in three cycles with two meeting for each. The finding of pretest showed that among students, 10 students (24,39%) exceeded the score of 65 or more, and 31 students (75, 61%) got score less than 65. While the average score was 50,01. In the first cycle, there were 15 students (36,58%) exceeded score65 or more and 26 students (64,41%) got less than 65. The average score was 60,05. In the second cycles, there were 25 students (60,97%) exceeded score 65 or more and 16 students (39,02%) got less than 65. And the average score was 64,05. In the last cycle, there were 36 students (87,80%) exceeded score 65 or more and 5 students (12,19%) got less than 65. While the average score was 78,50. From the findings, it is found there was …… of increasing of students! Comprehension. Thus, it could be concluded that the integrated expository and heuristic strategy is effective in increasing the eleventh grade students folktale comprehension at SMA Al Ikhlas Lubuklinggau

References

Abrams, M.H. 1966. a Glossary of Literary Term (Copyright. 1941. by Dan S Norton and Petters Rushton)
Baried, Baroroh et. Al. 1985: Memaham ipuisi dalam Sastra Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusbinbangsa Depdikbud.
Burhan , Yasir. 1991. Problema Bahasa dan Pengajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung : Ganaco.
Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri dan Zain, Aswan. 2002. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Depdikbud. 2001. Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi untuk Taman Kanak-Kanak, Sekolah Dasar, dan Sekolah Menengah.Kebijakan Umum: Jakarta.
Depdiknas. 2007. Pedoman Penyusunan Usulan dan Laporan Pengembanan Inovasi Pembelajaran di Sekolah (PIPS) tahun anggaran 2008. Jakarta: Depdiknas
Djamaris, Edwar. 1984. Menggali Khasanah Melayu Klasik (Sastra Indonesia Lama). Jakarta: Proyek Penerbitan Buku Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah.
Fang, Liaw Yock. 1991. Sejarah Kesusastraan Melayu Klasik Jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Gulo, W. 2002. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Hooykass, C. 1947. Over Maleische Literature. Leiden: EJ. Brill.
Ikram, Achadiati. 1997. Filologi Nusantara. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
Jabrohim. 1994. Pengajaran Sastra. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Muslihah, et. Al. 2006. Kolaborasi Pendekatan Struktural dengan Pendekatan Kontekstual Melalui Metode Diskusi dalam Mengoptimalisasikan Pembelajaran Apresiasihikayat Siswa kelas XI SMA AL Ikhlas Lubuklinggau (2006)”. Lubuklinggau: STKIP.
Nurgiantoro, Burhan., 2000. Teori Pengkajian Fiksi. Gajah Mada University Press: Yogyakarta.
Rahmanto; B. 1998. Metode Pengajaran Sastra. Yogyakarta : Kanisius.
Rosjidi, Ajip. 1988. Sejarah Sastra Indonesia. Jakarta: Bina Aksara
Semi, Atar. 1993. Metode Penelitian Sastra. Bandung: Angkasa.
Semi, Atar. 1998. Anatomi Sastra. Padang: Angkasa Raya.
Wardani, I. G. A. K. 1991. Pengantar Apresiai Sastra Prosa. Jakarta P 36 Depdikbud.
Wellek, Renne dan Warren Austin. 1956. Theory of Literature. New: York: Harcourt, Bracand Company.
Published
2011-12-31